Joshua Knobe (left) and Andy Egan (right) on moral relativism.
Knobe explains his surprising research suggesting that folk intuitions are more closely aligned with relativism than philosophers often assume. Egan describes his ongoing work on relativist semantics. Knobe presses Egan on whether Egan’s views provide a satisfactory account of moral disagreement and of the grounds for criticism of an ideally coherent sadist. Along the way, they discuss whether philosophical analysis of shared concepts ought to be “hermeneutic” or “revolutionary.”
Related works
by Egan:
“Relativism about Epistemic Modals” (forthcoming)
“Disputing About Taste” (forthcoming)
“Epistemic Modals, Relativism, and Assertion” (2007)
by Knobe:
et al., “Folk Moral Relativism” (forthcoming)
See also:
John Burgess and Gideon Rosen, A Subject With No Object (1997)
Experimental Philosophy: Hagop Sarkissian, Are People Actually Moral Objectivists?
More video:
Joshua Knobe’s diavlogs (BhTV)
To download this episode of Philosophy TV right click here and select “save link as” to download a .mp4 version of this conversation. If your mobile device supports .mp4 streaming, clicking that link will allow you stream the video.
The pdf of “Folk Moral Relativism” cuts off at page 22.
Thanks, Rob. The link is fixed.
Looks like J. Kenobe is reconverting Gender Studies (as they were initially designed) to “analytic” strategies…