Christy Mag Uidhir and Aaron Meskin

Christy Mag Uidhir and Aaron Meskin on the definition of art.

Do you prefer Youtube? Go here.

Mag Uidhir and Meskin begin with an overview of philosophical approaches to the definition of art since the 1950s: Morris Weitz’s anti-essentialism about art (0:44); George Dickie’s institutional theory of art (4:44); and the recent decline of interest among philosophers in the definitional project (7:46). Mag Uidhir attacks the institutional theory (9:18). Meskin talks about the recent surge of attention to particular art forms (16:48). Mag Uidhir describes his work with P.D. Magnus on pluralism about art concepts (21:10). Then Mag Uidhir and Meskin debate Mag Uidhir’s views on the possibility and significance of art failure (30:39). They conclude with a discussion of Meskin’s wide-ranging experimental work on the mere exposure effect, the semantics of aesthetic adjectives, and the nature of aesthetic testimony (49:59).

Related works

by Mag Uidhir:
Blog: Aesthetics for Birds
Art and Art-Attempts (2013)
with P.D. Magnus: “Art Concept Pluralism” (2011)
“Failed-Art and Failed Art-Theory” (2010)

by Meskin:
with Phelan, Moore, and Kieran: “Mere Exposure to Bad Art” (2013)
with Roy T. Cook (editors): The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach (2012)
“The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered” (2009)

See also:
Morris Weitz, “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics” (1956)
George Dickie, “Defining Art” (1969)
Arthur Danto, “The Artworld” (1964)

Comments are closed.